Contact Us | About Us |
Movie Screenings Sweepstakes Special Offers
Campus Circle > Sports > Special Feature
Sports: Special Feature

NCAA Will Appeal Ruling in Ed O'Bannon Antitrust Case

By David Wharton and Lee Romney
NCAA Will Appeal Ruling in Ed O'Bannon Antitrust Case
(Credit: Facebook/ncaastudents)

Article tools
sponsored by

(MCT) Two days after losing a major antitrust case in federal court, the NCAA announced Sunday it would appeal the decision, which challenges its long-standing definition of amateurism in college sports.

"We remain confident that the NCAA has not violated antitrust laws," Donald Remy, the association's chief legal officer, said in a statement. "We will also be seeking clarity from the district court on some details of the ruling."

UCLA basketball star Ed O'Bannon had brought the case on behalf of Division I men's basketball and football players concerned about the NCAA using their names, images and likenesses to generate revenue from the licensing of television broadcasts, advertisements and video games, among other things.

U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken ruled that NCAA policies "unreasonably restrain trade" by banning athletes from profiting from their own names, images and likenesses.

The ruling did not order the NCAA to share revenue, but lifted the restriction that prohibits its Division I schools from doing so. The member schools and conference may now provide athletes with the "the full cost of attendance" and offer to give them "a limited share of licensing revenue" that would be held in a trust until they graduate or leave school. 

The amount of that share can be capped at no less than $5,000 per player annually.

Wilken stopped short of lifting a ban that prevents athletes from signing commercial endorsements on their own.

On Sunday, Remy said "the court supported several of the NCAA’s positions, and we share a commitment to better support student-athletes."

Earlier last week, the NCAA board of directors voted to give the most powerful football conferences more say in policy-making, a move that could lead to larger athletic scholarships that cover the full cost of attendance.

"We look forward to presenting our arguments on appeal, and in the meantime we will continue to champion student-athlete success on the field and in the classroom," Remy said.


©2014 the Los Angeles Times

Visit the Los Angeles Times at

Distributed by MCT Information Services

Article posted on 8/11/2014
This article has been viewed 134 times.

Read Campus Circle

View Issues Online
View Issues Online
Current and past issues
View Issues

Download Current Issue
Download Current Issue
PDF Format
Related Articles You Might Like...

Special Feature Wealthiest Football Leagues Have More Freedom to Pass Legislation 185 views

Special Feature Donald Sterling Loses Court Battle to Prevent Sale of Clippers 257 views

Special Feature Man Behind College Football Union Ruling Works to Protect Those Without a Voice 355 views

Special Feature Verdict Reached in Bryan Stow Lawsuit Against Dodgers, Frank McCourt 368 views

Special Feature What to Expect When NCAA President Mark Emmert Takes the Stand 565 views

Special Feature NCAA Settles One Lawsuit on Paying Student-Athletes, Battles Another 218 views

Special Feature College Sports' Billion-Dollar Issue: Who Pays Freight on Pay-to-Play? 149 views

Special Feature Steve Tisch Gives UCLA $10 million for Sports-Related Brain-Injury Program 283 views

Special Feature NBA Sets Up Hearing to Terminate Donald Sterling's Ownership of Clippers 310 views

Special Feature Magic Johnson Answers Donald Sterling's Accusations, Insults in CNN Interview 181 views
Member Comments