|
|
|
| |
solar sailor wrote:
This will be my last entry although I see comments from others on their likability of certain films with simple words. Mr. Sacripanti, thanks for the advice. I took the liberty of dropping my review line on Entertainment Weekly, which I always subscribe to.
Posted: 12:39am | 5/23/2013
Brian Sacripanti wrote:
I have to agree with Mitchell. Solar Sailor - it's nice that you try to provide your intelligent and detailed opinion, but there's a reason Rotten Tomatoes exists...look into getting an account and go post your reviews there. I like to provide in depth reviews as well, just not on here so that I don't annoy people. This page is meant for receiving passes, not reviewing the movies you see.
Posted: 11:03am | 5/22/2013
solar sailor wrote:
I appreciate your comments about my sounding like complaints when I see a movie, but I don't want to say in simple, ordinary words such as nice or ugly. I always like to type something technical whenever I answer the surveys after future screenings a la Entertainment Weekly or (as mitchelldick would mention) Siskel & Ebert (not Roper). I have no problem so far when I tell things that way to my friends &/or relatives without upsetting anyone. Thanks!
Posted: 1:56am | 5/12/2013
Antiwarrior wrote:
@Mitchell- solar sailor makes a point. The movie deviates too far from the comic.
And he's right about Bin Laden too was a story for the public appeasement fairytale.
Posted: 4:45pm | 5/10/2013
mitchelldick wrote:
solar sailor it's nice you make commants about movies but siskel and roper are both dead and never can be replaced thanks guy but to long in the tooth
Posted: 3:02pm | 5/8/2013
deuces_cuh wrote:
can someone stop solar sailor from posting his review every single time he sees a movie. it's always a complaint.
Posted: 1:26pm | 5/7/2013
solar sailor wrote:
I thought that the first 2 Iron Man prequels were much better than this latest installment. I wish Jon Favreau direct this film again, but he turned down the offer. Man, the Mandarin sounded as the fictional Osama bin Laden with some mad political ideology. What left me confused was the villain himself. The rings that he wore were supposed to emit special powers aside from the fact that he's a superb martial arts expert. But in the movie, the accessories were treated as mere ornaments to enhance his influence a la Khadafy. What's with the leadership hazily transferred from the Mandarin to that AIM lackey Killian?
The humor's still there all right, but the story had some drag to carry on. The ending left me dry & unstirred.
Posted: 12:59pm | 5/4/2013
kirstinE wrote:
Only 73 views for The Great Gatsby on Tuesday, May 7 in L.A. and I enter the code and all the passes are taken :( :( :( :( :(
Posted: 5:04pm | 4/30/2013
AHolmes wrote:
SOOOOO bummed I didn't get into the Pain & Gain Premiere on Monday night... I waited in line and they ran out of tickets. It would have been my first premiere and Mark Wahlberg is my all time favorite Actor. =(
Posted: 3:03pm | 4/24/2013
solar sailor wrote:
I gladly saw "Pain & Gain" at the Regal LA Live downtown on 4/18/13. The film might be great, but not as sharp as any tropical gangster movie. I still enjoyed the story directed by that action specialist, Michael Bay. I was thinking of either Quentin Tarantino or Barry Sonenfeld as a good fit for the genre.
Posted: 2:47pm | 4/23/2013
Click here to see the all of the comments...
|
|
|
|
|
